« Should Courts Defer to an Agency's Interpretation of Terms Drawn from Criminal Law? | Main | 4th Circuit Deepens Division Over Scope of Computer Fraud & Abuse Act »

August 01, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Nicholas J. Wagoner

Good point Emil!

Emil Kiehne

Whatever comes of this circuit split, I agree with the Court's observation that "prudent counsel will make sure to renew their arguments in a Rule 50 motion."

In my opinion, this falls into the category of "Issues you don't want to be litigating on appeal"!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Search by